Sarah Bro
Fifth Circuit Says No Preliminary Injunction in Boozy Beverage Trademark Fight
By Sarah Bro on Dec 17, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
The maker of BRIZZY-brand hard seltzer claimed that consumers would confuse a product branded VIZZY hard seltzer with its own. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit disagreed, however, and affirmed the district court’s denial of the preliminary injunction with an explanation as to how the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial...
Continue Reading
“You’ve Changed!”—New Trademark and TTAB Fees Incoming
By Sarah Bro on Dec 10, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
Effective January 2, 2021, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is increasing and adding certain trademark and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) fees. The changes come after a nearly three-year fee status quo. The following TTAB fees will increase anywhere from $25 to $200: Petition to cancel filed through the Electronic System...
Continue Reading
Making Waves: Post-Employment Contract Assignment Provision Invalid Under California Law
By Sarah Bro on Dec 3, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit invoked “precedents that are relevant but not directly on point” to examine when employment contract provisions may require assignment of inventions conceived post-employment and without use of the former employer’s confidential information, finding that an intellectual property assignment provision in the employer’s predecessor’s employment agreement was...
Continue Reading
Trademark Cancellation Is Appropriate Sanction for Misconduct
By Sarah Bro on Nov 4, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
In upholding a grocery store chain’s standing to petition for cancellation of a US trademark registration, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB’s) express authority to impose cancellation of a trademark by default judgment as a sanction in a TTAB proceeding. Corcamore, LLC v. SFM,...
Continue Reading
Eye Don’t: No Counterfeiting Without Likelihood of Confusion
By Sarah Bro on Oct 15, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
Referring to the act of counterfeiting as “hard core” or “first degree” trademark infringement, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for the first time confirmed that the Lanham Act requires a likelihood of confusion in order for the trademark holder to prevail on a counterfeiting claim. Arcona, Inc. v. Farmacy Beauty, LLC,...
Continue Reading
Diamonds to Dust? Too Many Factual Disputes Precludes Summary Judgment
By Sarah Bro on Aug 26, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a district court’s summary judgment grant in favor of a fine jewelry producer for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair competition because factual disputes exist around whether the accused infringer’s use of the word “Tiffany” was merely descriptive of a particular ring setting, thereby supporting a...
Continue Reading
“Salacious” Content Doesn’t Bar Discovery in Copyright Infringement Suit
By Sarah Bro on Jul 30, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit preserved discovery options for copyright owners fighting online piracy when it reversed the district court’s refusal to allow a subpoena of an alleged online infringer’s internet service provider. The DC Circuit found that the district court abused its discretion by relying heavily on the...
Continue Reading
Knock It Off, Knockoffs? Ninth Circuit Affirms Trade Dress Rights but Not Fame
By Sarah Bro on Jul 9, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
Taking on issues of functionality and fame relating to trade dress rights, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s judgment after a jury trial on claims of infringement and dilution of trade dress rights in furniture. The Ninth Circuit distinguished utilitarian functionality from...
Continue Reading
Copyright Office, Not Courts, Determines Validity of Registrations Containing Inaccurate Information
By Sarah Bro on Jun 10, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
With the validity of a copyright registration at issue, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s judgment after a jury trial and award of attorney’s fees in favor of the plaintiff in a copyright infringement action, holding that the district court was required to request the Register...
Continue Reading
Prayer for Declaratory Relief Invokes Copyright Act and Available Attorneys’ Fees
By Sarah Bro on May 28, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
Vacating the district court’s order denying a defendant’s recovery of attorneys’ fees under the Copyright Act, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that, even when asserted as a claim for declaratory relief, any action that turns on the existence and potential infringement of a valid copyright invokes the Copyright Act and...
Continue Reading