Jodi Benassi
Chalk One Up to the Knock-Off
By Jodi Benassi on May 27, 2020
Posted In Copyrights, Patents
Addressing issues of design patent infringement, copyright infringement, trade dress infringement and unfair competition, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment on all claims. Lanard Toys Limited v. Dolgencorp LLC, Ja-Ru, Inc., Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc., Case No. 2019-1781 (Fed. Cir. May 14, 2020) (Lourie,...
Continue Reading
Bad Conduct During Litigation Means Attorneys’ Fees Against the Government, Regardless of Damage Amount
By Jodi Benassi on May 14, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the US Court of Federal Claims attorneys’ fees award for patent infringement by the United States solely based on its actions during litigation. Hitkansut LLC, Acceledyne Technologies, LTD, LLC v. United States, Case No. 19-1884 (Fed. Cir. May 1, 2020) (Prost, CJ).
Continue Reading
Prevailing at the PTAB Can Mean Prevailing Party Attorneys’ Fees
By Jodi Benassi on May 7, 2020
Posted In Patents
Addressing whether attorneys’ fees may be awarded in a patent infringement lawsuit where an accused infringer successfully invalidates claims in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the accused infringer is considered the “prevailing party” for purposes of 35 U.S.C. § 285, but remanded for...
Continue Reading
No Disgorgement When Injunction is Sufficient Remedy
By Jodi Benassi on Apr 23, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
Addressing issues related to the disgorgement of profits and attorneys’ fees in a trademark infringement lawsuit, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a denial of such fees and profits. Safeway Transit LLC and Aleksey Silenko v. Discount Party Bus, Inc., Party Bus MN LLC, and Adam Fernandez, Case No. 18-2990 (8th...
Continue Reading
Nefarious Motives Could Mean No Declaratory Judgment for You
By Jodi Benassi on Apr 2, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to dismiss a first-filed declaratory judgment complaint, finding that equitable considerations warranted departure from the first-to-file rule. Communications Test Design, Inc. v. Contec, LLC, Case No. 19-1672 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2020) (O’Malley, J.).
Continue Reading
Failure to Mark Can Put Damages Underwater
By Jodi Benassi on Mar 12, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that patented articles must be marked in order for the patentee to recover pre-notification or pre-complaint damages. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., Case No. 19-1080 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2020) (Lourie, J). In 2002, Arctic Cat entered into a licensing agreement with...
Continue Reading
2019 IP Law Year in Review: Copyrights
By Jodi Benassi, Mary Hallerman and Paul Devinsky on Feb 27, 2020
Posted In Copyrights
Executive Summary In many ways, copyright jurisprudence in 2019 was a study in contrasts. While certain cases represented a “back to basics” approach, answering fundamental questions such as “When can a copyright owner sue for copyright infringement?” and “What costs can a prevailing copyright owner recover?,” others addressed thorny issues involving fair use and the...
Continue Reading
Federal Circuit Confirms – Blackbird Not Fit to Litigate
By Jodi Benassi on Jan 15, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s award of attorneys’ fees and expenses to deter serial patent filers’ future “abusive litigation.” Blackbird Tech LLC, DBA Blackbird Technologies v. Health in Motion LLC, DBA Inspire Fitness, Leisure Fitness Equipment LLC, Case No. 18-2393 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2019) (Wallach, J.)....
Continue Reading
Data Processing Software Checks Out as Patent Eligible
By Jodi Benassi on Jan 3, 2020
Posted In Patents
PATENTS / SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY / ABSTRACT IDEA Addressing an issue of software subject matter eligibility, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment on the pleadings under 35 USC § 101, finding claims related to error checking patent eligible. Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Gemalto M2M GMBH et al., Case...
Continue Reading