McDermott Will & Emery
Subscribe to McDermott Will & Emery's PostsForeign Company’s Purposeful US Activities Blemishes Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Defense
By McDermott Will & Emery on Sep 9, 2021
Posted In Trademarks
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal of a complaint, finding that the foreign defendant was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in the United States in light of the defendant’s marketing, sales and operations, each of which reflected a significant focus on the United States. Ayla, LLC v....
Continue Reading
Second Circuit Rejects FTC Challenge of 1-800 Contacts, Highlighting Procompetitive Trademark Policy
By Marisa (Reese) E. Poncia and McDermott Will & Emery on Jun 24, 2021
Posted In Antitrust, Trademarks
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a final order of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which had found that agreements to refrain from bidding on keyword search terms for internet advertisements violated Section 5 of the FTC Act. The Court made clear that although trademark agreements are not necessarily immune from...
Continue Reading
Printed Matter Is Patentable If It’s Functional, Not Just Communicative
By McDermott Will & Emery on Nov 19, 2020
Posted In Patents
In a tour de force of issues related to the printed matter doctrine, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed various rulings that the patents-in-suit were not infringed, not willfully infringed and invalid as directed to printed matter. Instead, the Court held that there was substantial evidence in the record to support...
Continue Reading
No Stay, But Please Fix
By McDermott Will & Emery on Nov 4, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a motion to stay issuance of a mandate while a petition for certiorari regarding patentability under § 101 was pending before the Supreme Court of the United States, finding no irreparable harm if it did not do so. American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco...
Continue Reading
No Due Process Violation When New Panel Hears Substantive Arguments
By McDermott Will & Emery on Oct 8, 2020
Posted In America Invents Act, Patents
Affirming a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) non-obviousness determination, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in sanctioning a patent owner who engaged in ex parte communications by having a new panel hear the merits of the petition. Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com Inc.,...
Continue Reading
Hooked on Precedent or Something New
By McDermott Will & Emery on Aug 13, 2020
Posted In Patents
Highlighting internal disagreement regarding patent eligibility under § 101, a divided panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a series of opinions revising and reissuing a previous opinion on § 101 patent eligibility for a mechanical invention and, in an even split, denied a petition for en banc review. American Axle...
Continue Reading
Technical Issues Affirm Patent Validity but Preclude Pre-Suit Damages
By McDermott Will & Emery on Jul 22, 2020
Posted In Patents
In a split decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the subject matter eligibility of claims directed to collection, comparison and classification of information. The Court also unanimously found that the patent owner was not entitled to pre-suit or enhanced damages because it failed to prove pre-suit patent marking by its...
Continue Reading
“Seams” Like Activity Giving Rise to Infringement Risk Supports Appellate Jurisdiction
By McDermott Will & Emery on Jul 8, 2020
Posted In America Invents Act, Patents
Adding to its body of jurisprudence on standing to challenge an adverse final written opinion in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found a petitioner had constitutional standing to appeal where it showed it engaged in activity that would give rise to a possible infringement suit. Adidas...
Continue Reading
Focusing on Functionality, Software Claims Found Patent Eligible
By McDermott Will & Emery on May 14, 2020
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that patent claims directed to a communication system were patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claimed invention changes the normal operation of a communication system to overcome a problem specifically arising in the realm of computer networks. Uniloc USA, Inc. v. LG...
Continue Reading
Stratus Update: Federal Circuit Affirms TTAB Refusal to Register Telecoms Mark
By McDermott Will & Emery on Apr 30, 2020
Posted In Trademarks
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) refusal to register the mark STRATUS over the existing registration for STRATA, finding a likelihood of confusion between the two marks. Stratus Networks, Inc. v. UBTA-UBET Communications, Inc., Case No. 19-1351 (Fed....
Continue Reading
