Amol Parikh
Reasonable Royalty Available for Foreign Activities (But Not This Time)
By Amol Parikh on Apr 11, 2024
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to preclude a patent owner from seeking damages based on method claims infringed outside of the United States but confirmed that reasonable royalties are available based on foreign activities. Harris Brumfield v. IBG LLC, Case No. 22-1630 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27,...
Continue Reading
PTO Stands by Patent Fee Increases
By Amol Parikh on Apr 11, 2024
Posted In Patents
The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) issued a notice of rulemaking announcing proposed patent fee increases beginning next year. 89 Fed. Reg. 23226 (April 3, 2024). The proposed increases are generally consistent with the PTO’s May 2023 proposal. The Notice states that the PTO needs the proposed fee adjustments to provide sufficient revenue to...
Continue Reading
Deception Inspection: Attorney Faces Discipline for Citing Fake Law
By Amol Parikh on Feb 8, 2024
Posted In Technology
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit referred an attorney for potential further disciplinary measures after the attorney cited a nonexistent case created by ChatGPT. Park v. Kim, Case No. 22-2057 (2d Cir. Jan. 30, 2024) (Parker, Nathan, Merriam, JJ.) (per curiam). Minhye Park sued David Dennis Kim for an action related to...
Continue Reading
Keep Calm and Party On: New Issue Prohibition Doesn’t Apply to Motions to Amend
By Amol Parikh on Jan 25, 2024
Posted In Patents
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial & Appeal Board obviousness determination, explaining that inter partes review (IPR) statutory provisions that prohibit an otherwise time-barred party from introducing new issues into the proceeding do not apply to motions to amend. CyWee Group Ltd. v. ZTE (USA), Inc. et al.,...
Continue Reading
PTO Creates Separate Design Patent Bar
By Amol Parikh on Dec 7, 2023
Posted In Patents
The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) published its final rule, creating a separate design patent bar where admitted design patent practitioners will practice in design patent proceedings only. (88 Fed. Reg. 78644 (Nov. 16, 2023).) Prior to this rulemaking, there was a single patent bar for those who practice in patent matters before the...
Continue Reading
Suite! Claim Splitting Privity Focuses on Party Relationship, Not Claim Relationship
By Amol Parikh on Nov 2, 2023
Posted In Trade Secrets
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit revived a hotel group’s federal trade secret suit against two former employees, finding that the district court did not have enough information to conclude that the hotel group improperly split claims between federal and state actions. Armadillo Hotel Group, LLC v. Harris, Case No. 22-50945 (5th...
Continue Reading
Rough Seas Ahead? Supreme Court to Reconsider Chevron Doctrine
By Amol Parikh on Oct 26, 2023
Posted In Cert Alert
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to reconsider the Chevron doctrine, which instructs courts to defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that US Congress delegated to the agency to administer. Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, Case No. 22-1219 (Supr. Ct., Oct. 13, 2023) (certiorari granted). The question...
Continue Reading
Seeking Harmony: Supreme Court to Consider Retrospective Relief for Timely Copyright Claims Under Discovery Rule
By Amol Parikh on Oct 5, 2023
Posted In Cert Alert
The Supreme Court of the United States agreed to consider whether a copyright plaintiff’s timely claim under the discovery rule is subject to retrospective relief for infringement occurring more than three years before the suit was filed. Warner Chappell Music, et al. v. Nealy, Case No. 22-1078 (Supr. Ct., Sept. 29, 2023) (certiorari granted). The specific...
Continue Reading
Chilly Adventures: Design Patent Prior Art Comparison Applies to Article of Manufacture
By Amol Parikh on Sep 28, 2023
Posted In Patents
Addressing a matter of first impression concerning the scope of prior art relevant to a design patent infringement analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “to qualify as comparison prior art, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.” Columbia Sportswear North America,...
Continue Reading
Tragic Ending: Award-Winning AI Artwork Refused Copyright Registration
By Amol Parikh on Sep 21, 2023
Posted In Copyrights
The US Copyright Office (CO) Review Board rejected a request to register artwork partially generated by artificial intelligence (AI) because the work contains more than a de minimis amount of content generated by AI and the applicant was unwilling to disclaim the AI-generated material. Second Request for Reconsideration for Refusal to Register Théâtre D’opéra Spatial...
Continue Reading